<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Guide to Marketing Labor Laws &#187; Media Coalition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guidetomarketinglaborlaws.com/tag/media-coalition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guidetomarketinglaborlaws.com</link>
	<description>Your Guide to Marketing Laws and the Marketing Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:28:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The California Video Game Law and Its New Opponent</title>
		<link>http://guidetomarketinglaborlaws.com/marketing-law-news/the-california-video-game-law-and-its-new-opponent/</link>
		<comments>http://guidetomarketinglaborlaws.com/marketing-law-news/the-california-video-game-law-and-its-new-opponent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video game law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guidetomarketinglaborlaws.com/marketing-law-news/the-california-video-game-law-and-its-new-opponent/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Media Coalition is the latest opponent of the 2005 California video game law that makes it illegal for dealers to sell violent and sexually-explicit video games. This was the report from Arstechnica.com last week citing Media Coalitionâ€™s filing of an amicus brief before the court.
This news is another manifestation of how media organization uses its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://guidetomarketinglaborlaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/21-scrupcomau.jpg' title='http://scrup.com.au'><img src='http://guidetomarketinglaborlaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/21-scrupcomau.jpg' alt='http://scrup.com.au' /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mediacoalition.org">Media Coalition</a> is the latest opponent of the 2005 California video game law that makes it illegal for dealers to sell violent and sexually-explicit video games. This was the report from Arstechnica.com last week citing Media Coalitionâ€™s filing of an <a href="http://mediacoalition.org/legal/VSDAvSchwarzenegger/amicus%20brief.pdf ">amicus brief</a> before the court.</p>
<p>This news is another manifestation of how media organization uses its influence to avert an industrial crisis targeting certain enterprises. What is wrong with prohibiting the sale of violent and sexually-explicit video games to minors? Isnâ€™t it just right to keep our kids from any stuff that arouses violence and irresponsible sex? I fully support the implementation of the law despite its possible negative effects to business.</p>
<p>For the link to the article, click <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080228-media-coalition-joins-fight-against-california-videogame-law.html ">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://guidetomarketinglaborlaws.com/marketing-law-news/the-california-video-game-law-and-its-new-opponent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
